INTEZAR ALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
/71/2025 · 2025-01-09
Karunesh Singh Pawar
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114864 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114864 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1563 Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 71 of 2025 Appellant :- Intezar Ali Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Shiv Prakash Mishra,Amitabh Kumar Tripathi,Ashish Kumar Shukla,Manish Kumar Shrivastav,Shiv Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A. for the respondent State. Learned A.G.A. has raised preliminary objection regarding maintainability of this appeal in view of the law laid down by coordinate bench of this Court in the case of Rinku vs. State of U.P. passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.33075 of
2018.
Learned counsel for the appellant prays for withdrawal of the appeal with liberty to file appropriate petition under section 482 Cr.P.C. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Office is directed to return certified copy of the documents to
learned counsel for the appellant.
Order Date :- 9.1.2025 Madhu D.R/P.S Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench