RAMDEV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. HOME AND 3 OTHERS
/9/2025 · 2025-01-09
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114840 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114840 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1945 Court No. - 15 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9 of 2025 Applicant :- Ramdev Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Home And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Akhilendra Kumar Goswami Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Deo Prakash Srivastava Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
1. Sri Deo Prakash Srivastava, advocate, has put in appearance by way of filing vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant and the same is taken on record.
2. Objection is raised by the counsel for the State that the present anticipatory bail application is not maintainable in the term that the applicant has committed offence under section 70(2) of BNS, 2023. Subsection 4 of section 482 of BNSS 2023 is quoted hereinunder:-
"Nothing in this section shall apply to any case involving the arrest of any person on accusation of having committed an offence under section 65 and sub-section (2) of section 70 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023."
3. Referring the aforesaid, he has emphasised that it has been provided that the provisions of section 482 of BNSS shall not apply to any case involving the arrest of any person or on acquisition of having committed an offence under section 65 and sub-section 2 of section 70 BNS, 2023 thus, submission is that the instant application may be dismissed.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant has failed to controvert the
contentions of counsel for the State.
5. In view of the aforesaid, the instant anticipatory bail application is dismissed.
6. Consigned to records.
Order Date :- 9.1.2025 Mayank Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench