2025:UHC:7838 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2505/2024 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Vishwast Kandpal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, Deputy Advocate General for the State Mr. Digvijay Singh Bisht, Advocate for respondent Nos. 4 and 5. 2. According to petitioner, he is serving as Tax Revenue Inspector in Zila Panchayat, Nainital and is member of Uttarakhand Zila Panchayat Karmchari/Adhikari Mahasangh (for short “Employees’ Association”). He is challenging a communication dated 10.09.2024, issued by Joint Director, Panchayati Raj Directorate, whereby outgoing General Secretary of the Employees’ Association was requested to hold meeting of the association on 18.09.2024, so that Executive Body of the association is elected on the said date. 3. It was further indicated in the said letter that all officers/employees of different Zila Panchayats, who will be participating in the meeting, will be sanctioned leave as per Government Order dated 10.10.2013. 4. It is an admitted position that election for reconstituting Executive Body of the association was held in 2024. Petitioner contends that election was held in violation of 2025:UHC:7838 clause (10) of the bylaws of the association, therefore election deserves to be set aside, and the concerned authorities be directed to conduct the election as per provisions contained in clause (10) of the bylaws of the association. 5. Learned State Counsel submits that writ petition would not be maintainable for the relief claimed by petitioner as the Employees’ Association is registered as a society and the society is neither owned nor controlled by State Government and it is also not receiving any financial aid from State or Central Government. 6. This Court finds substance in the submission made by learned State Counsel. 7. Recognition to an Employees’ Association, if granted by State Government, will not upgrade its status. The association in question is neither funded nor controlled by the State and it is also not discharging any public function. Every society is formed with certain objects, as set out in its bylaws; however, every society is not amenable to writ jurisdiction of this Court. 8. Even otherwise also, bylaws of a society cannot be termed as law within the meaning of Article 13 of Constitution of India and violation, if any, of the bylaws will not entitle 2025:UHC:7838 the aggrieved person to file writ petition. The remedy available to a person, who is aggrieved by violation of bylaws, would be to approach a civil court. 9. For the aforesaid reasons, this Court declines to entertain this writ petition and same is dismissed with liberty to petitioner to approach a competent Court of law. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 03.09.2025 Mahinder/ MAHINDER SINGH Digitally signed by MAHINDER SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=da6212e6e78d94ed3134842bc6a8d6ca168979ca7b8c2f031a92d1a18b08923c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=AB77B7C5B240908B392BE84F5CDD4C2AF35DC4626D305B1BC9EA4BABA43D2B8F, cn=MAHINDER SINGH Date: 2025.09.08 19:02:13 +05'30'