( 2025:JHHC:13354 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3575 of 2025 ------ Maulvi Bulbul Jamali @ Md. Jamal Ansari, aged about 33 years, son of Idrish Ansari, resident of Village-Ghujji, P.O.- Ghujji, P.S.-Dhanwar, Dist.-Giridih … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Shree N. Roy, Advocate For the State : Mr. Santosh Kr. Shukla, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 02.05.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No.355 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under sections 341/ 342/ 354/ 354B/ 376/ 506/ 509/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons committed penetrative sexual assault upon the minor victim girl and committed rape upon her. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and drawing attention of this Court to the deposition of the victim which has been examined as P.W.1 during the trial of the petitioner vide POCSO Case No. 12 of 2025, it is submitted that in paragraph no.5, she has categorically stated that the petitioner did not do anything with her. It is next submitted that the mother of the victim who has been examined as P.W.2 in the said case has also not supported the case of the prosecution and was declared hostile, on the prayer of the prosecution and P.W.3 -informant who is also the father of the victim has also been declared hostile, on the prayer of the prosecution and the P.W.2 and 3, have also categorically stated that the petitioner did not do any objectionable act with their daughter. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 05.12.2024, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 21 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, POCSO Act, Giridih, in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No.355 of 2023 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu-Gunjan/