Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 114802 (PNJ)

SANDEEP KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CWP/22884/2010 · 2025-03-11

Jagmohan Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-22884-2010 (O&M) 1 138+303 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-22884-2010 (O&M) Date of Decision:11.03.2025 SANDEEP KUMAR ..…..Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS …..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Akshay Bhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sushant Kareer, Advocate, Mr. Akhilesh Barak, Advocate and Mr. Jagtej Singh Kang, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Palika Monga, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Ram Niwas, Advocate for Mr. R.K. Doon, Advocate for respondent Nos.4 and 5. Mr. Akshay Kumar Goel, Advocate for respondent No.11 Mr. Dinesh Arora, Advocate and Mr. Ashish Khatkar, Advocate for respondent Nos.13, 17, 18 & 19. Mr. Amit Jhanji, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Premi, Advocate, Ms. Triyyambika Rao, Advocate Ms. Nandita Verma, Advocate and for respondent No.12. Mr. Mahipal S. Yadav, Advocate for respondent No.14. Mr. Govind Mor, Advocate for respondent No.15 Mr. J.S. Ahlawat, Advocate and Mr. Navdeep Singh, Advocate for respondent No.21. Asgar Ali 2025.03.17 08:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-22884-2010 (O&M) 2 Mr. Ravinder Malik (Ravi), Advocate for respondent No.15. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL , J. (Oral) 1. For orders, see detailed order of even date passed in CWP- 13414-2011 titled as ‘AMIT KUMAR VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS’. 2. Pending misc. application (s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( JAGMOHAN BANSAL ) JUDGE 11.03.2025 Ali Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Asgar Ali 2025.03.17 08:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document