Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010088942024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3473/2024 ABC/476 OM PRAKASH RAUT S/O LT. DUDH NATH ROUT R/O TINIALI BAGAN NEAR FOOTBALL FIELD P.S. TINGKHONG DIST. DIBRUGARH, ASSAM. VERSUS 1: THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER and SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, IN THE HOME DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6. 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI-7. 3:DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM GUWAHATI. 4:SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE DIBRUGARH ASSAM For the Applicant(s) : Ms. T. Som, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Mrs. R.B. Bora, Junior Govt. Advocate, Assam. – B E F O R E – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI 10.03.2025 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ) The matter comes upon for consideration of the interlocutory application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 with a prayer to condone the delay of 66 days in filing the connected writ appeal. Page No.# 2/2 The application is not seriously opposed by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and after going through the contents of the interlocutory application, we are of the view that the delay of 66 days in filing the connected writ appeal is liable to be condoned. Hence, the interlocutory application is allowed. The delay of 66 days in filing the connected writ appeal is condoned. The interlocutory application stands disposed of. Registry is directed to register the connected appeal and list the same for admission after 2(two) weeks. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant