208 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-3773-1999 Date of decision : 04.03.2025 Sunita Kansal ...Appellant Vs. Municipal Committee, Bathinda and another ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Present: None for the appellant. Ms. Kavita Arora, Advocate for the respondents. *** ANIL KSHETARPAL , J. (Oral) 1. As per the office report, notice issued to the appellant's counsel has been received back with the report that he has died. 2. This Court would have directed the office to issue notice to the appellant, however, the appellant's address is incomplete. In the memo of parties, her address is reflected as under:- "Sunita Kansal wife of Madan Lal son of Mehar Chand resident of Bathinda." Bathinda is a town with the population of approximately more than 5 lacs. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty to the appellant to file application for revival. (ANIL KSHETARPAL) 04.03.2025 JUDGE neeraj Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes No Whether Reportable : Yes No NEERAJ 2025.03.05 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document