Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2780-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 138 of 2025 Petitioner :- Md. Kaif Respondent :- Union Of India Chief Passport Officer New Delhi And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Farhan Shaikh,Iqbal Ahmad,Mohd. Kumail Haider Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved due to pendency of his application for issuance of passport. 3. It appears that there was a Non Cognizable Report registered in the police station, as claimed in the writ petition, but as per petitioner's counsel no investigation took place, as, a compromise was entered into between the parties, therefore, he says that there is no impediment in issuing the passport. 4. Mr. Varun Pandey, learned counsel for the opposite parties says that some show cause notice was communicated to the petitioner, but, he is not having the same. Counsel for the petitioner feigns ignorance. 5. Let Mr. Pandey provide copy of the show cause notice to the petitioner whereupon the petitioner should respond to the same, thereafter, the opposite party no. 2 shall take decision regarding issuance of passport to the petitioner at the earliest, say, within three weeks of the receipt of the response. If Mr. Pandey does not provide copy of the show cause notice within three days from today, petitioner should move application before the opposite party no. 2 informing him about the aforesaid facts whereupon he shall take the decision as aforesaid. 6. The petition is disposed of. [Brij Raj Singh, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 16.1.2025 Santosh/- Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench