HARI KISHORE MEHTO ALIAS RAJ KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
WPCRL/2145/2021 · 2025-05-13
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11478 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11478 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPCRL No.2145 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
There is no representation for the petitioner.
2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. for the State.
3. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions, submits that after investigation charge sheet has been submitted on 30.12.2021 against the petitioner and two other persons.
4. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the State, the writ petition has rendered infructuous, however it is open to the petitioner to challenge the charge sheet before appropriate forum.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
13.05.2025 SK