KAMLESH KUMAR TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU.ITS PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 7 ORS.
WRIC/164/2025 · 2025-01-20
Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114778 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114778 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:3446-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 164 of 2025 Petitioner :- Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru.Its Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 7 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajnish Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Hemant Tripathi Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard The petitioner has purchased the land in question, which is being encroached by the private parties, hence this petition. Such a dispute is not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Sri Hemant Tripathi has put in appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos.6, 7 and 8 says that they are in possession. We are not inclined to entertain this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner may avail other remedy as may be prescribed under the law, as the dispute is between the private parties. This may include approaching the concerned authorities, if otherwise permissible under the law.
Disposed of.
Order Date :- 20.1.2025 S. Kumar Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench