Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11473 (ALL)

DEEPAK MISHRA AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/5789/2022 · 2025-09-07

Raj Beer Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5789 of 2022 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJ BEER SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State. 2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing of entire proceedings, including cognizance / summoning order dated 22.07.2020, of Case No. 970 of 2020 (State Vs. Deepak Mishra), arising out of Case Crime No.249 of 2019, under Sections 323, 504, 452, 354Kha, 324 IPC, P.S.- Mugra Badshahpur, District- Jaunpur, pending in the court of A.C.J.M.-IInd, Jaunpur, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 3. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicants that the alleged dispute between the parties has taken place due to misconception and that now both the parties have amicably settled the dispute and the informant of the case and the injured do not want to pursue the impugned proceedings. In the alleged incident no one has sustained any serious injury. The compromise filed by the parties before the trial court concerned, has already been verified by the court concerned, copy of which is on record. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 has concurred with the arguments of learned counsel for the applicants and submitted that both the parties have amicably settled the dispute and compromised the matter and the informant and injured do not want to proceed with the case pending before the trial court and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dinesh Kumar Tripathi, Dipendra Kumar Tripathi, Tryambak Nath Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Chandra Shekhar Mishra, G.A. Deepak Mishra And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection if parties compromise the matter. 6. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 7. It is well settled that in appropriate cases criminal proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise between the parties, by invoking inherent powers enshrined under Section 482 Cr.P.C. In the instant case, the matter relates to private dispute between the parties. If parties compromise the matter, it would not have adverse impact on society. The informant of the case and the injured do not want to pursue the impugned proceedings. The compromise filed by the parties before the trial court, has already been verified by the court concerned. Considering aforesaid facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed. 8. In view of the aforesaid, entire impugned proceedings, including cognizance / summoning order, of the aforesaid case against applicants, namely, Deepak Mishra, Ashwani Mishra, Dilip Mishra & Chakradhar Mishra are hereby quashed. 9. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed. September 8, 2025 'SP'/- A482 No. 5789 of 2022 2 (Raj Beer Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad