Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
188 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No. 111 of 2025 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 04.03.2025
AU Small Finance Bank Limited .......... Petitioner Versus
Sh. Manav, PCS, The Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Courts Complex, Pathankot (exercising functions under Section 14 of the Securitization Act, 2002) .......... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Present: Mr. Nitin Thatai, Advocate and
Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Athar Ahmad, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab
for the respondent.
**** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of petitioner has been resolved by providing possession of the mortgaged property in question; thus, he wishes to withdraw the present petition. [2] Dismissed as withdrawn. [3] Rule stands discharged.
March 04, 2025
( HARKESH MANUJA ) 'dk kamra'
JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
Dinesh Kumar 2025.03.04 18:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document