IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 5430/2025 Decided on: 09.04.2025 Jagdish Chand & Ors. …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. P. P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Memo of parties read with Annexure P-2 reflect that the petitioners had filed different writ petitions previously, which were disposed of under separate orders. On the basis of separate decisions of those different writ petitions, which have not even been placed on record, relief has been prayed for against office order dated 28.03.2024. The petition not only suffers from mis-joinder of parties but is also not supported with required documents. 2. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 liberty to file afresh petitions, in accordance with law and proper pleadings with supportive documents. 3. Granting liberty as sought, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 09th April, 2025(rohit)