217 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA SUNITA KUMARI SH VINAY KUMAR IRPS SEC. HSSC AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Ashish Yadav, Addl. A.G., Haryana. HARKESH MANUJA Learned counsel for respondents submits that in terms of the order passed by the Writ Court, speaking order dated has been passed rejecting the claim of the petitioner. No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Even on the previous date, no one appeared on his behalf. In the wake of speaking order dated 29.01.2025, the order passed by the Writ Court stan orders are required to be passed in the present petition and the same is thus, disposed of. Rule discharged. 29.01.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: SUNITA KUMARI Versus SH VINAY KUMAR IRPS SEC. HSSC AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA None for the petitioner. Mr. Ashish Yadav, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for respondents submits that in terms of the order passed by the Writ Court, speaking order dated has been passed rejecting the claim of the petitioner. No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Even on the previous date, no one appeared on his behalf. In the wake of speaking order dated 29.01.2025, the order passed by the Writ Court stands complied with, as such, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition and the same is thus, disposed of. Rule discharged. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH COCP-81-2025 Date of Decision: January 29, 2025 ........Petitioner SH VINAY KUMAR IRPS SEC. HSSC AND ANOTHER....Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Ashish Yadav, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Learned counsel for respondents submits that in terms of the order passed by the Writ Court, speaking order dated 29.01.2025 has been passed rejecting the claim of the petitioner. No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Even on the previous date, no one appeared on his behalf. In the wake of speaking order dated 29.01.2025, the order ds complied with, as such, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition and the same is (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No 2025 January 29, 2025 Learned counsel for respondents submits that in terms of 29.01.2025 No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Even on In the wake of speaking order dated 29.01.2025, the order ds complied with, as such, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition and the same is TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.01.31 11:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document