Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11468 (KAR)

THE MANAGER, IFFCO-TOKIO v. NASEEMA W/O RAMJAN ASKI AND ORS

MFA/202290/2018 · 2025-03-17

C M Joshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1643 MFA No. 202290 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI MISCL. FIRST APPEAL NO.202290 OF 2018 (WC) BETWEEN: THE MANAGER, IFFCO-TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., 3RD FLOOR, SUDEV PLAZA, DAJIBAN PETH, OPP: LAXMI TEMPLE, HUBLI, THROUGH AUTHORISED SIGNATORY. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SUBHASH MALLAPUR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. NASEEMA W/O RAMJAN ASKI @ ASHIGWALE, AGE: 20 YEARS, OCC: H. HOLD, R/O MALLI, TQ. JEWARGI, DIST. KALABURAGI-585 102. 2. MOHAMMA S/O RAMJAN ASKI @ ASHIGWALE, AGE: 01 YEAR, MINOR, R/O MALLI, TQ. JEWARGI, DIST. KALABURAGI-585 102, U/G OF R-1 MOTHER. 3. ROSHAN W/O BABU ASKI @ ASHIGWALE, AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: H. HOLD, R/O MALLI, TQ. JEWARGI, DIST. KALABURAGI-585 102. Digitally signed by SHIVALEELA DATTATRAYA UDAGI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1643 MFA No. 202290 of 2018 4. SHAIAK WAHAB PASHA S/O MOHEMMAD SALARUDDIN, AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O H.NO.31131, SHANTRASWADI, TQ. SHORAPUR, DIST. YADGIR-585 202. …RESPONDENTS (R1 AND R3 ARE SERVED; R2 IS MINOR U/G OF R1) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 30 (1) OF THE EMPLOYEE’S COMPENSATION ACT, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN ECA NO.07/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, SHORAPUR, EXAMINE THE SAME AND ON BEING SATISFIED, BE PLEASED TO ALLOW THE APPEAL BY SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 26.07.2018 PASSED IN ECA NO.07/2018. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI) 1. The learned counsel for the appellant files a memo stating that in MFA No.202138/2018, the contentions have been - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1643 MFA No. 202290 of 2018 considered already and therefore, the present appeal has become infructuous. 2. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE tsn* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4 CT: AK