MO. KHALEEQ @ (INCORRECTLY MENTIONED AS MD. KALLAN IN THE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE L.D.A.) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOUSING AND URBAN PLANNING, LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/144/2025 · 2025-01-17
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114657 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114657 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:3060 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 144 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mo. Khaleeq @ (Incorrectly Mentioned As Md. Kallan In The Proceedings Before L.D.A.) Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Housing And Urban Planning, Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd.Altaf Mansoor,Tanay Chaudhary,Yogesh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Naveen Chandra Upadhyay,Ratnesh Chandra Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel and Sri Ratnesh Chandra, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents no.3, 4 and 5.
2. The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 03.10.2024 passed by the Chairman, LDA, whereby, the appeal preferred by the petitioner was dismissed as well as the order dated 20.08.2024, whereby, whereby the directions were issued for sealing the premises.
3. The contention of the Counsel for the petitioner is that on a petition filed by third person, the seal of the premise was opened for a certain period and thereafter again closed. He further argues that the compounding application filed by the petitioner has been rejected on the ground that the name of the petitioner was not mutated in the agricultural records.
4. Considering the fact that the compounding application is subject matter of the revision, which is said to be pending at the instance of the petitioner; Guest House-cum-Barat Ghar of the petitioner is running for the last 20 years, the respondents are directed to open the seal, however, the petitioner is directed to ensure that no constructions are carried out over the premises in question.
5. As the petitioner has already filed a revision, the same shall be decided by the revisional authority in accordance with law after hearing the parties.
6. The interim order granted above shall continue till the disposal of the revision by the revisional authority.
7. The writ petition is disposed off in the above terms. Order Date :- 17.1.2025 akverma Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench