IN THE H 129 SHAHZAD @ S STATE OF HAR CORAM: HON Present : Mr. Mr. MANISHA BAT )*(' , - 2. The complaint got lod that the petition 04.10.2024. Initia registered. The p investigation, the added. The petitio grant of pre-arre Additional Sessio 3. It is had joined the in and 351(3) of B HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AN AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M Date of de @ SAHZAD …. P Versus F HARYANA …. R HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Mr. Vinay Kumar Pandey, Advocate Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryan **** BATRA, J. (oral) !"# &'( '&( & % &' ( The aforementioned FIR has been re got lodged by the complainant-Mustafa etitioner along with co-accused had nitially a case under Sections 115(2), The petitioner had joined the investig n, the offences under Sections 109 and petitioner while apprehending his arrest arrest bail which had been dismisse Sessions Judge, Nuh vide order dated 2 It is argued by learned counsel for the investigation before inclusion of th ) of BNS and an iron rod i.e the we B AND HARYANA M No.874 of 2025 of decision: 10.01.2025 …. Petitioner …. Respondent ANISHA BATRA ocate for the petitioner. Haryana. ' .)*( $ % ' . (+ .# / een registered on the basis of written ustafa on 09.10.2024 alleging therein had assaulted his son-Salaudin on 15(2), 3(5) and 315 of BNS had been vestigation and during the course of 09 and 351(3) of BNS had also been is arrest had moved an application for dismissed by the Court of learned ated 24.12.2024. l for the petitioner that the petitioner n of the offences under Sections 109 he weapons used at the time of the . ritten erein n on been se of been n for rned ioner s 109 f the Jyoti 2025.01.14 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order Chandigarh CRM-M No.874 occurrence had a effected from him extended benefit Judge, Nuh. His served by detain deserves to be ext 4. 5. 1 3 $ 6 3 7 0 9 " 10.01.2025 Jyoti-IV o.874 of 2025 -2- had also been got recovered at his i om him. The co-accused whose case i enefit of pre-arrest bail by the Court h. His custodial interrogation is not re etaining him into the custody. Ther be extended benefit of pre-arrest bail. 0 1 2 2 4 30 2 3 6 323 !"# 0+ 0 2 7 8 7 5 3 " 23 3 7 0 (MA Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/N Whether reportable : Yes/N t his instance. No recovery is to be case is on similar footing have been Court of learned Additional Sessions s not required. No purpose would be . Therefore, it is urged that he too, bail. 3 * 9 0 5 4 . 3 : " 2 5 " 0 25 0 3 0 3 0 (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE es/No. es/No o be been ssions d be too, Jyoti 2025.01.14 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order Chandigarh