Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11462 (RAJ)

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN v. SANJU CHOUDHARY D/O SH. KANRI RAM DHAKA

WRES/209/2025 · 2025-07-03

Chandra Prakash Shrimali, Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 209/2025 In D.B. Special Appeal Writ Petition No.16/2024 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14940/2018 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Director, Medical, Health and Family Welfare, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C- Sheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. The National Health Mission, Director, Medical And Health Services, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. The Project Director, National Health Mission, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. The State Health And Family Welfare Institute, Through Its Director, Jhalana Institutional Area, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 5. Rajasthan Nursing Council, Through Its Registrar. 6. Jamia Urdu Aligarh, Through Its Registrar, Jamiya Urdu Road, Dodpur, P.O. Aligarh (U.P.). ----Petitioners Versus 1. Sanju Choudhary D/o Sh. Kanri Ram Dhaka, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Rasulpura Tehsil Fatehpur District Sikar (Raj). 2. Laxmi Jakhar D/o Sh. Mukhram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Bhuma Chhota, Tehsil And District Sikar. 3. 4. Tara Bai W/o Sh. Amar Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village And Post Ghardana Kalan Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu,(Raj). Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of H.R.D., New Delhi. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sankalp Vijay Advocate on behalf of Mr. Vigyan Shah, Additional Advocate General. HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI (2 of 2) [WRES-209/2025] Order 03/07/2025 1. Heard on application (No.341/2025) for condonation of delay in filing the restoration application. 2. Taking into consideration the cause shown in the application, we are inclined to condone the delay in filing the restoration application. Delay is, accordingly, condoned. 3. Application for condonation of delay is allowed. 4. Heard on prayer for restoration of the appeal. 5. Taking into consideration the cause shown in the restoration application, we are inclined to allow restoration application. 6. Accordingly, restoration application is allowed and D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.16/2024 is restored to its original number. (CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ SANJAY KUMAWAT/Diksha-42