A. Abdul Razak v. Chief Executive Officer / Secretary
REV.APLW(MD)/32/2012 · 2025-07-18
A D Maria Clete, S M Subramaniam
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114615 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114615 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
REV.APLW.(MD)No.32 of 2012 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.07.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE REV.APLW.(MD)No.32 of 2012 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2012 A.Abdul Razak ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Chief Executive Officer / Secretary, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.1, Jafar Sirang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai. 2.Superintendent of Wakfs, Ramanathapuram Region at Ramanathapuram. 3.Khadar Shah
...Respondents PRAYER: Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 r/w Section 114 of C.P.C., to review the order dated 27.07.2012 passed in W.P.(MD)No.6680 of 2012 by this Court. 1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
REV.APLW.(MD)No.32 of 2012 For Petitioner : Mr.P.Athimoola Pandian For Respondents : No Appearance
ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the observations made by the Division Bench of this Court in the said Writ Petition, which are sought to be reviewed, would cause prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to approach the Wakf Tribunal. 2.This Court is of the considered opinion that the observations are made based on the merits of the case. Therefore, this Court do not find any error apparent. Accordingly, this Review Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
(S.M.S., J.) & (A.D.M.C., J.)
18.07.2025
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Yuva 2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
REV.APLW.(MD)No.32 of 2012 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND DR.A.D.MARIA CLETE, J. Yuva REV.APLW.(MD)No.32 of 2012 18.07.2025 3/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis