MANJU KHANNA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND 12 OTHERS
WRIC/99/2025 · 2025-02-18
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114598 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114598 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:10869-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 99 of 2025 Petitioner :- Manju Khanna And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And 12 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nisha Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard Miss Nisha Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner. Grievance of the petitioners is essentially against their son and daughter-in-law. The opp. party Nos. 7 to 13 are daughter-in- law and her relatives, who are residing at Gurugram, Haryana. Such disputes cannot be adjudicated under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, especially in view of the reliefs claimed. The petitioners may avail the remedies as may be prescribed under the Maintenance of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 and Rules made thereunder. With the above observations/directions, this writ petition
disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to initiate appropriate proceedings as per law, as, such a dispute would involve questions of fact including disputed questions of facts. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.)
Order Date :- 18.2.2025 A.Nigam Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench