M/S A.N. SALES CORPORATION AND ANOTHER v. M/S SURYA INDUSTRIES AND ANOTHER
CR/250/2021 · 2025-03-10
Vikas Bahl
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114597 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114597 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CR-250-2021 (O&M); -1- CR-259-2021 (O&M) and CR-269-2021 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (226)
1.
CR-250-2021 (O&M) M/s A.N. Sales Corporation and another ....Petitioners Versus M/s Surya Industries and another .....Respondents
2.
CR-259-2021 (O&M) M/s A.N. Sales Corporation and another ....Petitioners Versus M/s Surya Industries and another .....Respondents
3.
CR-269-2021 (O&M) M/s R.K. Industries and another
....Petitioners Versus M/s Surya Industries and another .....Respondents Date of decision: - 10.03.2025
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- Mr. Avnish Mittal, Advocate, Ms. Aparna Singhal, Advocate, and Mr. Gorav Kashyap, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. B.R. Mahajan, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Anil Chawla, Advocate, Ms. Nikita Goel, Advocate and Ms. Harita Dhanda, Advocate for the respondents.
NARESH KUMAR 2025.03.12 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement
CR-250-2021 (O&M); -2- CR-259-2021 (O&M) and CR-269-2021 (O&M) **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)
1. This order will dispose of above-mentioned three revision petitions as common question of fact arise in the same.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned senior counsel for the respondents have jointly submitted that there was a settlement between the parties in all the three suits and a common compromise had been reduced in writing and for implementation of the said compromise, the execution was filed, in which, three impugned orders had been passed, which are the subject matter of challenge in the present revision petitions.
3. During the course of arguments, a consensus has been arrived at between the parties and it has been jointly submitted by the
learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned senior counsel for the respondents, after taking instructions from their respective parties, that the present revision petitions be disposed of in view of the said consent. Accordingly, the present revision petitions are disposed of on the basis of consent with the following directions:- (i) In addition to the amount which had already been released in favour of the petitioners/decree holders, it has been agreed that an additional amount of Rs.70 lakhs would be paid by the respondents for satisfying the compromise decree passed in all the three revision petitions. The said amount would be the full and final settlement with respect to all three suits/compromise decrees.
NARESH KUMAR 2025.03.12 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement
CR-250-2021 (O&M); -3- CR-259-2021 (O&M) and CR-269-2021 (O&M) (ii) The respondents would deposit an amount of Rs.25 lakhs on or before 31.03.2025 before the Executing Court and the Executing Court on such deposit being made would immediately release the same to the decree holders/petitioners. (iii) The balance amount of Rs.45 lakhs would be deposited by the respondents/judgment debtors on or before 31.05.2025 before the Executing Court and on the said deposit being made, the Executing Court would release the same to the petitioners/decree holders immediately. (iv) Learned senior counsel for the respondents has pointed out that certain demand drafts including a demand draft dated 06.02.2021 for an amount of Rs.32,19,000/ was deposited by the respondents which had not been credited in favour of the petitioners and since the respondents have undertaken to deposit the amount as per directions No.(ii) and (iii), thus, they be permitted to withdraw the said demand draft. In case, an application is moved by the respondents for withdrawing the said demand draft dated 06.02.2021, then, the Executing Court would return the same to the respondents. (v)
Learned counsel for the petitioners has pointed out that in the present case, vide order dated 12.02.2021, a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court while issuing notice of motion had observed “meanwhile, alienation of assets of M/s Surya Industries mentioned in the plaint shall remain stayed.” It is prayed that the said order be continued till 31.05.2025 or till the time the entire amount of Rs.70 lakhs is deposited by the respondents. Learned senior counsel for the respondents has submitted that once the entire amount is deposited, then, the interim order be automatically vacated and grant of stay NARESH KUMAR 2025.03.12 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement
CR-250-2021 (O&M); -4- CR-259-2021 (O&M) and CR-269-2021 (O&M)
order should not come in the way of the parties in finalizing the compromise. Accordingly, the interim order dated 12.02.2021 to the effect “meanwhile, alienation of assets of M/s Surya Industries mentioned in the plaint shall remain stayed.” would continue till 31.05.2025 or till the time the respondents deposit the entire amount of Rs.70 lakhs, as undertaken before this Court. In case of the said deposit having been made on or before 31.05.2025, then, the said interim order would be deemed to have been vacated on the date the said deposit is made. (vi) Both the parties would be bound by the said compromise.
4. All the pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of in view of the above.
( VIKAS BAHL ) March 10, 2025
JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No NARESH KUMAR 2025.03.12 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement