Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 114574 (ALL)

RASM GOPAL SHUKLA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECRETARY SUGAR CANE AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/1088/2006 · 2025-05-15

Brij Raj Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:28731 Court No. - 28 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1088 of 2006 Petitioner :- Ram Gopal Shukla And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P.Through Secretary Sugar Cane And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Anand Dixit,Shri Sampurnanand Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Paramanand Asthana Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J. 1. Case called out in revised list. 2. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners to press this writ petition. However, Sri Paramanand Asthana, learned counsel for the opposite parties is present. 3. The matter pertains to the year 2006 and since then it has remained pending. It appears that petitioners have lost their interest to pursue their case. Apart from it, by efflux of time, writ petition has become infructuous. 4. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) Order Date :- 15.5.2025 Rao/- Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench