Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11455 (RAJ)

MUKESH SEPAT @ MUKESH KUMAR S/O SHRI JEEVAN RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3838/2025 · 2025-07-21

Uma Shanker Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:27095] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3838/2025 Mukesh Sepat @ Mukesh Kumar S/o Shri Jeevan Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Mohan Ka Bas, Karansar, Police Station Renwal, District Jaipur, At Present Tenant Plot No. 34, Bhomiya Nagar, Vikash Nagar, Kalwar Road, Jaipur. Hingoniya, At Present Bidash Nagar Extention, Jhotwara, Jaipur. (Presently Confined At Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5077/2025 Mohan Saini S/o Babulal Saini, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Maliwada, Via Kalwar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Shekhawat, Adv., with Mr. Tejpal Rulaniya, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saini, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.S. Shekhawat, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 21/07/2025 These bail applications have been filed by petitioners under Section 483 BNSS/439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.118/2025 registered at Police Station Jhotwara, District Jaipur (West) for the offence(s) under Section(s) 178, 179, 180, 318(4) & 61(2)(A) of BNS. [2025:RJ-JP:27095] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3838/2025] Learned counsel for petitioners submit that accused- petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in these cases. Learned counsel further submit that charge sheet has been filed. Learned counsel also submit that accused-petitioners have been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence petitioners may be enlarged on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed these bail applications. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of these cases and the fact that charge sheet has been filed, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of these cases, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge petitioners on bail. Accordingly, these bail applications filed under Section 483 BNSS/439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is ordered that accused- petitioners 1.Mukesh Sepat @ Mukesh Kumar S/o Shri Jeevan Ram & 2.Mohan Saini S/o Babulal Saini shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. A copy of this order be place in connected file. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J DANISH USMANI /67 & 68