Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11454 (RAJ)

MANOJ KUMAR MEENA S/O LATE SHRI GHANSHYAM MEENA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/4160/2025 · 2025-04-02

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:14727] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4160/2025 Manoj Kumar Meena S/o Late Shri Ghanshyam Meena, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Nayabas (Saithali), Tehsil Ramgarh, District Alwar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Police Head Quarter Lalkothi, Jaipur 3. Inspector General Of Police, (H.q.), Rajasthan Lalkothi, Jaipur. 4. Superintendent Of Police, Alwar 5. Director And Ex-Officio Govt. Deputy Secretary, Department Of Language And Library, Dr. Radhakrishanan Shiksha Sankul, Block No.8, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prakash Chand Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 02/04/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that vide order dated 11.12.2023 passed by the learned RAT, an interim protection was granted in favour of the petitioner and representation filed by the petitioner/appellant was directed to be considered and decided by way of speaking order. It is further submitted that inspite of lapse of approximately a year from the [2025:RJ-JP:14727] (2 of 2) [CW-4160/2025] date of submission of representation, the respondents have paid no heed to the same. Heard. Issue notices. On directions of the Court, Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, AAG accepts notices of behalf of the respondents. Considering the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this court deems it appropriate to dispose of the present petition with the directions to the respondent No. 2 to consider the representation of the petitioner within a period of 30 days, strictly in accordance with law, as per the ratio encapsulated in Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No. 1665/2024) and Circular issued by the Chief Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vuqq-&1@2012) and in light of the directions spelled out in order passed by the learned RAT. It is made clear that non-compliance of the aforementioned directions, may lead to initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent No. 2-Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Police Head Quarter Lalkothi, Jaipur In light of the aforestated, the present petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty being granted. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /121