Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11447 (AP)

Madhusudan Pisipati, v. The Director General of Police,

WP/6793/2025 · 2025-09-21

R Raghunandan Rao, T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010132602025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 6793/2025 Between: 1. MADHUSUDAN PISIPATI,, S/O. SESHACHALAM SASTRY PISIPATI, AGED 44 YEARS, OCC SOFTWARE ENGINEER, R/O.PLOTNO.178, H.NO.11-13-341, ROAD NO. 10, ALKAPURI COLONY, KOTHAPET, HYDERABAD-500 035. CURRENTLY RESIDING AT 6 BELLINGER CCT, CRAIGIEBUM VICTORIA 3064, AUSTRALIA. REPRESENTED BY HIS SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY, VENNELAKANTI MADHAVI W/O. VENNELAKANTI KISHORE, AGED ABOUT 45, OCC HOMEMAKER, R/O. H.NO.1-41/22, PLOTNO.22, SYNDICATE BANK OFFICER'S COLONY, HASMATHPET, TIRUMALAGIRI, TELANGANA - 500015 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH, ANDHRA PRADESH POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN, O/O. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CIRCLE OFFICE, MANGALAGIRI RURAL, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MANGALAGIRI RURAL POLICE STATION, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. GAYATHRI PISIPATI, D/O. DURGA PRASAD VISHUBHOTIA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC UN-INFORMED, RESIDENT OF U12/400, 2 CHAPEL ROAD, SYDNEY NSW 2200, AUSTRALIAN PASSPORT NO.PA 7243534 CURRENTLY RESIDING AT H.NO.10-332, SRI NAGAR COLONY, SIVALAYAM STREET, YERRABALEM, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. PIN CODE 522503. 6. DURGA PRASAD VISHNUBHOTLA, S/O. UN-INFORMED, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O. H.NO.10-332, SRI NAGAR COLONY, SIVALAYAM STREET, YERRABALEM, MANGALAGIRI GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. PIN CODE 522503. CONTACT 9121077804 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents more particularly respondents No.3 and 4 to cause production of Petitioner's minor daughter by name Amrutha Pisipati, aged 6 years, who is under the custody of Respondents 5 and 6 before this Hon'ble court IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be please to allow the Petitioner to amend the main Prayer as ““In the said circumstances, it is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to; i) issue a Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the Respondents more particularly Respondents No.3 and 4 to cause production of the Petitioner’s minor daughter by name Amrutha Pisipati, aged 6 years, who is under the custody of Respondents 5 and 6, before this Hon’ble court order for the repatriation of the Petitioner’s minor daughter Amrutha Pisipati to the Australia along with Respondent No.5. iii) to direct the Respondents 3 and 4 to conduct enquiry and place before this Hon;ble Court about the status of the Travel Visa of Respondent No.5. iv) to direct Respondent No.5 to furnish a copy of the Passport of the Petitioner’s daughter to the Petitioner; and to pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MOHANNAIR RAJEEV KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL 2. R GOPI MOHAN 3 The Court made the following ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) The learned counsel for the respondents 5 and 6 has filed a Memo bearing USR No.107678 of 2025 on 18.09.2025. The Passport and Visa of the 5th respondent and her daughter have been attached to the Memo. 2. The learned counsel for the respondents 5 and 6 submits that both the 5th respondent as well as her daughter have gone back to Australia. 3. In such circumstances, this Writ Petition is closed, leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue his remedies before the appropriate Court in Australia. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J ________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J Date:22.09.2025 KA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 6793/2025 Date:22.09.2025 KA