Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11446 (GAU)

NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY v. LOHIT CH DAS

I.A.(Civil)/1613/2025 · 2025-05-27

Budi Habung

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010088462025 2025:GAU-AS:6863 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1613/2025 NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY THROUGH THE GENERAL MANAGER ALIAS NF RAILWAY MALIGAON GUWAHATI- 11 VERSUS LOHIT CH DAS SON OF LATE MAHESWAR DAS VILL DEORALI MOUZA KAKHIN RANI P S PALASBARI DIST KAMRUP ASSAM Advocate- 2:SRI KHARGESWAR DAS SON OF LATE MAHESWAR DAS VILL DEORALI MOUZA KAKHIN RANI P S PALASBARI DIST KAMRUP ASSAM Advocate- 3:SRI BHARAT DAS SON OF LATE MAHESWAR DAS VILL DEORALI MOUZA KAKHIN RANI P S PALASBARI DIST KAMRUP ASSAM Advocate- 4:THE COLLECTOR KAMRUP ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MS S CHAKRABORTY Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for LOHIT CH DAS Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/1611/2025 NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY THROUGH THE GENERAL MANAGER ALIAS NF RAILWAY MALIGAON GUWAHATI- 11 VERSUS ON THE DEATH OF RES NO 2 KHARGESWAR DAS HIS LEGAL HEIR 2.1:SMTI MAKANI DAS W/O LATE KHARGESWAR DAS R/O- VILL- DEORALI UNDER MOUZA CHAYANI PO BONGRA PS- PALASHBARI DIST- KAMRUP ASSAM 781131 2.2:SMTI HIMADRI DAS D/O LATE KHARGESWAR DAS R/O- VILL- DEORALI UNDER MOUZA CHAYANI PO BONGRA PS- PALASHBARI DIST- KAMRUP ASSAM 781131 2.3:SRI MADAN DAS S/O LATE KHARGESWAR DAS R/O- VILL- DEORALI UNDER MOUZA CHAYANI PO BONGRA PS- PALASHBARI DIST- KAMRUP ASSAM 781131 ------------ Advocate for : MS S CHAKRABORTY Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for ON THE DEATH OF RES NO 2 KHARGESWAR DAS Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER Date : 28-05-2025 Heard Ms. S. Chakraborty, learned Standing counsel NF, Railway. This application has been filed under Order XXII Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 praying for substitution of respondent no. 2, namely Khargeswar Das (since deceased) by his legal heirs; namely Smt. Makani Das, wife of late Khargeswar Das, Smt Himadri Das daughter of late Khargeswar Das and Sri. Madan Das son of late Khargeswar Das as respondent nos. 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 respectively. Mr. R. Bhuyan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 and Ms. D. D. Barman, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate appearing for the respondent no. 4 are present and have no objection. Accordingly, the prayer of substitution of the respondent no. 2 is considered and allowed. Let Smt. Makani Das, Smt Himadri Das and Sri. Madan Das be impleaded as respondent nos. 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 respectively in L.A.App./61/2014. With the above, this IA stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant