CWP-12443 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 245 Navjot Singh State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. dated 27.09.2019, Annexure P compassionate appointment involved in various criminal offences. 2. and 11 of the petition specifically detailing therein that it was due to political vendetta, the petitioner was falsely implicated in 5 criminal cases of which he was acquitted, vide judgments Annexures P the date of his consideration. Further to the order dated 13.10.2014, Annexure P Standing Order, A 12443-2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Navjot Singh Versus f Punjab and Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Amandeep Singh Manaise, Advoc for the petitioner. Mr. Amarpeet Singh Bains, AAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing the order dated 27.09.2019, Annexure P-6, vide which case of the petitioner for compassionate appointment has been rejected involved in various criminal offences. Learned counsel refers to the averments made in paras 10 and 11 of the petition specifically detailing therein that it was due to political vendetta, the petitioner was falsely implicated in 5 criminal cases of which he was acquitted, vide judgments Annexures P the date of his consideration. Further a specific order dated 13.10.2014, Annexure P Standing Order, Annexure P-13, issued by the Police Department for -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12443-2021 (O & M) Date of decision: 03.03.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY , Advocate, Mr. Amarpeet Singh Bains, AAG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing the order 6, vide which case of the petitioner for has been rejected on account of being refers to the averments made in paras 10 and 11 of the petition specifically detailing therein that it was due to political vendetta, the petitioner was falsely implicated in 5 criminal cases of which he was acquitted, vide judgments Annexures P-7 to P-11, as on specific reference has been made order dated 13.10.2014, Annexure P-12, and para 13(c), of the 13, issued by the Police Department for PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.03.05 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-12443 recruitment of Constables, petitioner was acquitted, would not fall within 3. course of hearing, learned State counsel, on instructions, states that the respondents s the afore submissions, within a period of orders impugned in the present case, which believe the authorities would not address in a just, manner. 4. 5. petitioner is found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are advers granting opportunity of hearing to him and shall contain reasons, whereupon he shall be free to seek legal redress t 03.03.2025 parveen kumar Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable 12443-2021 recruitment of Constables, to submit that the criminal cases wherein the petitioner was acquitted, would not fall within The aforesaid facts having been brought out, during the course of hearing, learned State counsel, on instructions, states that the respondents shall re-examine the matter and decide afresh, taking note of the afore submissions, within a period of 6 orders impugned in the present case, which believe the authorities would not address in a just, The aforesaid satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioner. The matter stands disposed of accordingly and if the petitioner is found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same may be passed after granting opportunity of hearing to him and shall contain reasons, whereupon he shall be free to seek legal redress t Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No -2- the criminal cases wherein the petitioner was acquitted, would not fall within those specified therein. The aforesaid facts having been brought out, during the course of hearing, learned State counsel, on instructions, states that the examine the matter and decide afresh, taking note of 6 months, uninfluenced by the orders impugned in the present case, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable The aforesaid satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioner. The matter stands disposed of accordingly and if the petitioner is found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if e to his interest, the same may be passed after granting opportunity of hearing to him and shall contain reasons, whereupon he shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.03.05 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.