Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No.9110 of 2025
Decided on: 05.06.2025 _________________________________________________________________
Madan Lal
....Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. & Anr.
…Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioners: Ms. Ranjana Pathania, Advocates.
For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2.
This writ petition has been filed for grant of following substantive relief:-
“I That the respondents may kindly be directed to consider the case of the petitioner for grant of daily wage status w.e.f. 01.01.2009 after
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
- 2 - completion of part time services any thereafter for regularization aftercompletion of 8 years of daily wage services w.e.f. 01.01.2016 in view of regularization policy dated 18.06.2007 with all consequential benefits.”
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the relief prayed for and the legal issue involved in the case has already been adjudicated upon in Prem Singh Vs. State of H.P. and Ors2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that petitioner would be satisfied in case he is permitted to make a representation to respondent /Competent Authority for the redressal of his grievances, whereafter, respondent /Competent Authority be
directed to consider his representation within a time bound schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection for the same.
4.
Having regard to the aforesaid submissions, this writ petition is disposed of by permitting the petitioner to prefer a representation to respondent /Competent Authority within two week, the same shall be considered and decided by the Competent Authority, in accordance with law, keeping in view decision rendered in Prem Singh2, within a period of
2 CWPOA No. 7880 of 2019 of 2021, decided on 23.05.2022
- 3 - six weeks thereafter. Copy of decision so taken, be communicated to the petitioner.
The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge June 5, 2025 R.Atal