PRADIWAN BARANWAL v. SRI PRAMOD KUMAR UPADHYAY, SECY. REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY U.P., LKO.
CAPL/37/2025 · 2025-02-19
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114434 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114434 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:10910 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 37 of 2025 Applicant :- Pradiwan Baranwal Opposite Party :- Sri Pramod Kumar Upadhyay, Secy. Real Estate Regulatory Authority U.P., Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Fuhar Gupta,Devesh Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Shobhit Mohan Shukla Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Ms. Tanuj Singh, learned counsel, holding brief of Mr. Fuhar Gupta, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the judgment and order passed by the writ court has been complied with and for all practical purposes, the present contempt application has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. In view of above, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. Notice issued earlier, if any, stands discharged. Order Date :- 19.2.2025 Nitesh Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench