AMIT AGRAWAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/62/2025 · 2025-02-20
S Q H Rizvi, Vivek Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114395 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114395 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:11103-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 62 of 2025 Petitioner :- Amit Agrawal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satendra Kumar (Singh),Abhishek Misra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Apoorva Tewari,Shivang Tiwari Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Apoorva Tewari, learned counsel for opposite party no.4.
2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought quashing of the First Information Report dated 18.12.2024 bearing Case Crime No.0580 of 2024, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., Police Station Mohanlal Ganj, District Lucknow, through compromise.
3. On 9.1.2025, parties were directed to appear before the Senior Registrar for verification of compromise.
4. The report of the Senior Registrar of this Court dated 15.1.2025 is on record, according to which, he has verified the compromise on 15.1.2025. The original compromise is on record which has been annexed as Annexure-SA-2 to the supplementary affidavit filed on 9.1.2025.
5. According to the terms of the compromise, parties have decided to withdraw all the cases filed by them against each other including First Information Report dated 18.12.2024 bearing Case Crime No.0580 of 2024, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., Police Station Mohanlal Ganj, District Lucknow.
6. Learned counsel for the parties state that the dispute under the said compromise is already settled between the parties.
7. Intent is clear, the informant-Ajay Kumar Agrawal, who is a signatory to the compromise, does not want to press the FIR, therefore, no purpose would be served in allowing the proceedings even if charge sheet has been filed before the court
below to go on considering the nature of the dispute.
8. Accordingly, the impugned FIR, which is the basis to serve consequential proceedings of investigation and thereafter filing of charge sheet, if any, is hereby quashed. Consequently, all proceedings taken consequent to the lodging of the FIR including charge sheet, if any, filed before the court below stand quashed.
9. The writ petition is, accordingly, allowed.
10. The Senior Registrar of this Court shall communicate this
order to the court concerned for correcting its record, accordingly.
11. Learned AGA shall communicate this order to the investigating officer. . [Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.]
Order Date :- 20.2.2025 Sachin Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench