MADINA BEGUM AND ANR. v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (REVENUE)
WP(C)/2989/2025 · 2025-12-02
Rajesh Sekhri
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11439 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11439 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 94 Supp. List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 2989/2025 CM(7962/2025 MADINA BEGUM AND ANR. ….. Petitioner(s) Through: -
Mr. Ahmad Javid, Advocate.
V/s UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS.
….. Respondent(s) Through:-
Mr. Illyas Nazir Laway, GA
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
(ORDER)
02.12.2025. After brief submissions, Mr. Ahmad Javid, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that he will be satisfied if respondents are directed to consider present petition as a representation and accord consideration to the same within a timeframe. Mr. Laway, learned counsel for the respondents has no objection, provided it is directed to be done in accordance with law. Statements of learned counsels are taken on record. In view of the above, present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider it as a representation on behalf of the petitioners and accord consideration to the same as per law after affording an opportunity of being heard to the parties within a period of four weeks from the date a copy of this order along with copy of writ petition and annexures is made available.
Disposed of along with connected CM(s).
(Rajesh Sekhri) Judge
SRINAGAR
02.12.2025.
“Abdul Rashid”