Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 20 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 17 of 1993 Petitioner :- Ram Dular Respondent :- D.D.C.And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- B.K.Chaudhary Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.
1. Case called out in the revised list.
2. None is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. This Court vide order dated 04.01.1993 issued notices to the opposite party.
4. The office report dated 2.6.1995 provides that notice on behalf of the opposite party has been deemed sufficient under the Rules of the Court.
5. From the perusal of the record, it is evident that despite the
order dated 26.01.2014 passed by this Court providing opportunity to the petitioner to file a typed copy of the impugned order, the same has not been filed.
6. The matter is an old one pertaining to the year 1993. Non appearance of any counsel even in the revised list indicates that the petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing the case. The writ petition deserves to be dismissed for non prosecution.
7. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for the reason of non prosecution.
Order Date :- 30.1.2025 Arif Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench