Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 114375 (PNJ)

SIMARJIT KAUR v. BALWANT SINGH & ANR

RSA/560/2015 · 2025-02-25

Suvir Sehgal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RSA-560-2015 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (105+234) RSA-560-2015 (O&M) Date of decision:- 25.02.2025 Simarjit Kaur ...Appellant Versus Balwant Singh and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present:- Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. H.S.Batth, Advocate, for respondent No.1. … SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral) CM-2108-C-2025 Prayer made in the application filed under Order 23 Rule 3 read with Section 151, CPC, is for disposing of the appeal in terms of compromise dated 29.01.2025, Annexure A-1, executed between the parties. Counsel for the appellant states that during the pendency of the second appeal, a settlement has been arrived at between the parties and a written compromise, Annexure A-1, has been executed. Issue notice of the application. Mr. H.S.Batth, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of contesting respondent No.1. He has affirmed the factum of compromise between the parties. He does not have any objection in case the appeal is disposed off in terms of compromise, Annexure A-1. For the reasons given in the application, it is allowed. Annexure A-1 is taken on record. PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2025.02.28 09:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-560-2015 (O&M) -2- RSA-560-2015 (O&M) 1. In view of settlement arrived at between the parties, appeal is disposed off. Decree be modified in terms of compromise, Annexure A-1. 2. Pending application is also disposed off. (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE 25.02.2025 Pardeep Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2025.02.28 09:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.