Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No. 6049 of 2025
Decided on 13th May 2025 Aqeel Enterprises
…Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others
…Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Narender Singh Thakur,
Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Rahul Thakur, Deputy Advocate General.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as preliminary enquiry already stands conducted, therefore, these proceedings be closed with the observation that let subsequent action thereupon be taken by the Authority.
2.
In view of the above, without making any observation on the merits of the case, these proceedings are closed, but with the observation that let the Authority take appropriate action in the light of the enquiry. It is clarified that
2 this Court has not made any observation so as to give credence to the allegations made by the petitioner in the writ petition. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand
disposed of.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge
May 13, 2025 (Vinod)