CWP-20823 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (249) Tehal Singh and others National Commission for Scheduled Castes and others CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a writ, in the nature of certiorari, seeking quashing of order dated 25.07.2023 (Annexure P passed by the 2. (supra), can be passed by the respondent No.1, is the issue, which has been raised by the petitioner, by filing the instant w 3. for the respondents 20823-2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Tehal Singh and others Versus National Commission for Scheduled Castes HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Siddharth Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Indresh Goel, Sr. Panel Counsel for respondent No.1. Mr. Teevar Sharma, AAG, Punjab for respondents No.2 to 4. Mr. Sukhdeep Singh, Advocate for respondent No.5. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) Through the instant petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a writ, in the nature of certiorari, seeking quashing of order dated 25.07.2023 (Annexure P passed by the National Commission for Scheduled Whether such directions, which carry (supra), can be passed by the National Commission for Scheduled Castes respondent No.1, is the issue, which has been raised by the petitioner, by filing the instant writ petition. Before this Court adjudicate the issue (supra), learned counsel for the respondents-State, informs this Court that though 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-20823-2023 Date of Decision : 04.03.2025 …Petitioners Versus ...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI , Advocate Indresh Goel, Sr. Panel Counsel Mr. Teevar Sharma, AAG, Punjab Mr. Sukhdeep Singh, Advocate he instant petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a writ, in the nature of certiorari, seeking quashing of order dated 25.07.2023 (Annexure P-4), National Commission for Scheduled Castes, respondent No.1. her such directions, which carry in the impugned order National Commission for Scheduled Castes respondent No.1, is the issue, which has been raised by the petitioner, by Before this Court adjudicate the issue (supra), learned counsel State, informs this Court that though the directions have he instant petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a writ, in the nature of 4), respondent No.1. in the impugned order National Commission for Scheduled Castes, respondent No.1, is the issue, which has been raised by the petitioner, by Before this Court adjudicate the issue (supra), learned counsel have MANPREET SINGH 2025.03.06 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-20823 been passed by the investigation has levelled against the petitioner was found to be false, and a cancellation report thereof, has been filed before the has seized of the matter. 4. grievance of the petitioner has sub-judice, before the Court, at this stage, by the petitioner this Court, in case, in future any cause of action arise 5. March 04, 2025 Manpreet 20823-2023 been passed by the National Commission for Scheduled Castes investigation has been conducted through the SIT, and even the allegations levelled against the petitioner was found to be false, and a cancellation report thereof, has been filed before the learned Illaqa Magistrate concerned, who of the matter. Since the cancellation report has already been filed, and primary grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed, and the matter is judice, before the learned Illaqa Magistrate concerned, therefore, this , at this stage, refrains itself from answering the issue by the petitioner. Furthermore, liberty is granted this Court, in case, in future any cause of action arise Disposed of accordingly. 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2 National Commission for Scheduled Castes, however, the been conducted through the SIT, and even the allegations levelled against the petitioner was found to be false, and a cancellation report Illaqa Magistrate concerned, who cancellation report has already been filed, and primary been redressed, and the matter is Illaqa Magistrate concerned, therefore, this answering the issue (supra), as raised is granted to the petitioner, to re-access this Court, in case, in future any cause of action arises. (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No , however, the been conducted through the SIT, and even the allegations levelled against the petitioner was found to be false, and a cancellation report Illaqa Magistrate concerned, who cancellation report has already been filed, and primary been redressed, and the matter is Illaqa Magistrate concerned, therefore, this , as raised access MANPREET SINGH 2025.03.06 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment