CR-2752-1996 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Punjab State Power Corporation Limited Gangowal, Ropar and another M/s Harbhagwan Harbhajan Lal Engineering Contractual and others CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Ashish Kaushik, Advocate Mr. A.P.S.Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioners. None for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Brijesh, AAG, Punjab. for respondent No.3. LAPITA BANERJI This revision been filed by the State of Punjab being petitioner No.1. Later on who was the first petitioner was transposed as third respondent. 2. Civil Power Corporation Limited, petitioner No.2. 3. Upon perusal of the reco year 1985 which against the order 4. On April 19, 2022, none appear Even today, adjournment is being sought for on behalf of the petitioner 1996 (O&M) Sr. No.209 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-2752 Date of Decision : Punjab State Power Corporation Limited Patiala through Senior Executive Gangowal, Ropar and another Versus M/s Harbhagwan Harbhajan Lal Engineering Contractual and others HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Ashish Kaushik, Advocate for Mr. A.P.S.Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioners. None for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Brijesh, AAG, Punjab. for respondent No.3. *** LAPITA BANERJI, J. (Oral) This revision is pending since 1996. Originally, the same ha been filed by the State of Punjab being petitioner No.1. Later on who was the first petitioner was transposed as third respondent. Civil Revision was directed to be prosecuted by Punjab State Power Corporation Limited, Patiala as the only p petitioner No.2. Upon perusal of the record, it appears that the award was 1985 which had been made Rule of Court in 1986 and the appeal against the order was dismissed in 1996. On April 19, 2022, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Even today, adjournment is being sought for on behalf of the petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2752-1996 (O&M) Date of Decision : 20.01.2025 Patiala through Senior Executive …Petitioners M/s Harbhagwan Harbhajan Lal Engineering Contractual and others …Respondents HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI for None for respondents No.1 and 2. pending since 1996. Originally, the same had been filed by the State of Punjab being petitioner No.1. Later on the State who was the first petitioner was transposed as third respondent. Revision was directed to be prosecuted by Punjab State Patiala as the only petitioner instead of being rd, it appears that the award was of the made Rule of Court in 1986 and the appeal ed on behalf of the petitioner. Even today, adjournment is being sought for on behalf of the petitioner VANDANA 2025.01.21 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-2752-1996 since the petitioner appearing on its behalf. 5. It creates a distinct impression on the mind of this the petitioner is not interested to carry on the present proceedings. Accordingly, the same is 6. Liberty to apply. January 20, 202 Vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable 1996 (O&M) the petitioner Corporation had not contacted the learned counsel appearing on its behalf. It creates a distinct impression on the mind of this the petitioner is not interested to carry on the present proceedings. Accordingly, the same is dismissed as infructuous Liberty to apply. (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE , 2025 ther speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No contacted the learned counsel It creates a distinct impression on the mind of this Court that the petitioner is not interested to carry on the present proceedings. dismissed as infructuous. (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2025.01.21 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document