Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:HHC:29304 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CMPMO No.419 of 2017 Decided on: 29.08.2025 Shri Chandan Mehta
… Petitioner Versus Shri Hari Ram … Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________
_
For the petitioner : Mr. Karun Negi, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that with the passage of time the petition has lost its efficacy. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge August 29, 2025 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?