PARSHURAM v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER LUCKNOW and 3 ORS.
WRIC/1005986/2005 · 2025-09-16
Irshad Ali
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114274 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114274 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1005986 of 2005 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J.
1. List has been revised.
2. None has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition.
3. Learned Standing Counsel is present.
4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. September 16, 2025 GK Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., R.K. Singh, Sushil Kumar Singh (Irshad Ali,J.) Parshuram .....Petitioner(s) Additional Commissioner Lucknow And 3 Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAUTAM KUMAR SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench