Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11427 (RAJ)

ARSHAD S/O ILIYAS v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3808/2025 · 2025-03-12

Uma Shanker Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:11522] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3808/2025 Arshad S/o Iliyas, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Ghatmika, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg, Rajasthan (At Present Confined In Sub-Jail Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3809/2025 Saad S/o Ajad, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Village Kanhor, Police Station Pahadi, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (Currently In Sub Jail, Deeg, Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Liyakat Khan, Adv. Mr. Harendra Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agrawal, P.P., with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 12/03/2025 These bail applications have been filed by petitioners under Section 483 BNSS/439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.45/2025 registered at Police Station Pahari, District Deeg for the offence(s) under Section(s) 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 308(2) & 61(2) of BNS and under Section(s) 66D of IT Act. [2025:RJ-JP:11522] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3808/2025] Learned counsel for petitioners submit that accused- petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in these cases. Learned counsel further submit that accused-petitioners have been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence petitioners may be enlarged on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed these bail applications. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of these cases, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of these cases, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge petitioners on bail. Accordingly, these bail applications filed under Section 483 BNSS/439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is ordered that accused- petitioners 1.Arshad S/o Iliyas & 2.Saad S/o Ajad shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. A copy of this order be placed in the connected file. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J DANISH USMANI /193 & 194