Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 114249 (ALL)

RAM KISHOR GAUTAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/36/2025 · 2025-01-09

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1732 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 36 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Kishor Gautam Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Surendra Kumar Tripathi,Hari Krishna Srivastava,Sweta Swarankar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Sri Surendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. Grievance raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition is with regard to non consideration of candidature of petitioner for promotion to the post of Assistant Consolidation Officer. 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is working on the post of Consolidator and in the final seniority list published on 31.05.2022, the petitioner has been shown at Serial No. 518, while persons at Serial Nos. 526, 527, 519, 534, 562 who are junior to the petitioner have already been promoted to the post of Assistant Consolidation Officer, while case of petitioner has not been considered. 4. In the aforesaid circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter up to some length has submitted that grievance of petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case suitable directions are issued to respondent no. 2 - Consolidation Commissioner, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow to consider and decide petitioner's representation dated 25.12.2024 (annexed as Annexure - 8 to the writ petition), expeditiously. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection in case suitable directions are issued to respondent no. 2 to consider and decide petitioner's representation. 6. Accordingly, present writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no. 2 - Consolidation Commissioner, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow to consider and decide petitioner's representation dated 25.12.2024 (annexed as Annexure - 8 to the writ petition), expeditiously, say within four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law by means of reasoned and speaking order and communicate the decision to the petitioner. Order Date :- 9.1.2025 A. Verma (Alok Mathur, J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench