Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11423 (UTT)

JAMAN SINGH RAWAT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/2136/2021 · 2025-06-13

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.2136 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Kapruwan, Advocate for the petitioners, through video conferencing. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, D.A.G. with Mr. Vikas Uniyal, B.H. for the State. 3. There is no representation for respondent no.3. 4. Learned State counsel, on instructions, which are taken on record, submitted that after investigation a charge sheet dated 28.12.2021 has been submitted against petitioner no.2 – Smt. Godavari Rawat while petitioner no.1 – Jaman Singh Rawat has been exonerated. 5. In view of the submission made by counsel for the parties, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous; however it is open to the charge sheeted petitioner no.2 to challenge the aforesaid said charge sheet before appropriate forum under appropriate provision of law. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 13.06.2025 SK