Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11423 (KAR)

PRATHVIJEET v. AMUL AND ORS

WP/202373/2023 · 2025-03-14

Vijaykumar A Patil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1619 WP No. 202373 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.202373 OF 2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: PRATHVIJEET S/O BASWARAJ BORDE, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O BHEEMNAGAR, TQ. BHALKI, DIST. BIDAR-585401. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAVI B. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. AMUL S/O SHIVARAJ KIVADE, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O DONGAPUR, TQ. BHALKI, DIST. BIDAR-585328 2. SMT. INDUMATI D/O SHIVARAJ KIVADE(WIFE OF VILAS) AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD , R/O RULA VILLAGE, TQ. BASAVA KALYAN , DIST. BIDAR-585327 3. VANDANA D/O SHIVARAJ KIVADE AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD , R/O DONGAPUR VILLAGE , TQ. BHALKI, DIST. BIDAR-585328. Digitally signed by RAMESH MATHAPATI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1619 WP No. 202373 of 2023 4. CHANDANA D/O SHIVARAJ KIVADE (W/O VILAS ) AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O DONGAPUR VILLAGE , TQ. BHALKI, DIST. BIDAR-585328 5. SHIVRAJ S/O LAXUMAN KIVADE AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O DONGAPUR, TQ. BHALKI, DIST. BIDAR-585328 6. RANGAMMA W/O SHIVARAJ KIVADE, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD , R/O DONGAPUR, TQ. BHALKI, DIST. BIDAR-585328 7. BASWARAJ S/O SHIVARAJ CHINCHOLE, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O DONGAPUR, TQ. BHALKI, DIST. BIDAR-585328 8. DHANRAJ S/O SHIVARAJ CHINCHOLE, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD AGRICULTURE, R/O DONGAPUR, TQ. BHALKI, DIST. BIDAR-585328 …RESPONDENTS (NOTICE TO R-1, R3 TO R8 ARE SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO A WRIT OF CERTIORARI ANY OTHER WRIT OR DIRECTION TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 13.06.2023 IN OS NO. 60/2013 AS AT ANNEXURE- E PASSED BY THE COURT OF ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT BHALKI REJECTING I.A V UNDER ORDER XIII RULE 1 AND 2 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER / DEFENDANT NO 5 AND CONSEQUENTIALLY TO ALLOW THE APPLICATION AS PRAYED FOR. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1619 WP No. 202373 of 2023 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have settled their dispute amicably and the suit came to be decreed. 2. In view of the said submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE MSR LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 9 CT:SI