APHC010132652022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 8265/2022 Between: 1. NADENDLA VENKATESWARA RAO, SON OF. RAMARAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDENT OF HUSSAIN NAGARAM, PEDAKURAPADU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. NADENDLA GOPI, SON OF VENKATESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, RESIDENT PEDAKURAPADU MANDAL. 3. NADENDLA RAJESH, SON OF VENKATESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, RESIDENT OF HUSSAIN NAGARAM, PEDAKURAPADU MANDAL. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE JOINT COLLECTOR RBANDR AND ADDL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT 4. THE TAHSILDAR, PEDAKURAPADU, AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT 5. TELAPROLU VENKATESWARLU, SON OF VENKAIAH, HINDU, AGED IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 8265/2022 NADENDLA VENKATESWARA RAO, SON OF. RAMARAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDENT OF HUSSAIN NAGARAM, PEDAKURAPADU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT NADENDLA GOPI, SON OF VENKATESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, RESIDENT OF HUSSAINNAGARAM, PEDAKURAPADU MANDAL. NADENDLA RAJESH, SON OF VENKATESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, RESIDENT OF HUSSAIN NAGARAM, PEDAKURAPADU MANDAL. ...PETITIONER(S) AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL RY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE JOINT COLLECTOR RBANDR AND ADDL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUNTUR, GUNTUR THE TAHSILDAR, PEDAKURAPADU, PEDAKURAPADU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT TELAPROLU VENKATESWARLU, SON OF VENKAIAH, HINDU, AGED IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3233] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN NADENDLA VENKATESWARA RAO, SON OF. RAMARAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDENT OF HUSSAIN NAGARAM, NADENDLA GOPI, SON OF VENKATESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED OF HUSSAINNAGARAM, NADENDLA RAJESH, SON OF VENKATESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, RESIDENT OF HUSSAIN NAGARAM, ...PETITIONER(S) THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL RY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THE JOINT COLLECTOR RBANDR AND ADDL DISTRICT THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUNTUR, GUNTUR PEDAKURAPADU VILLAGE TELAPROLU VENKATESWARLU, SON OF VENKAIAH, HINDU, AGED 2 BKM,J W.P.No.8265 of 2022 82 YEARS, RESIDENT OF HUSSAIN NAGARAM, PEDAKURAPADU MANDAL. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order more in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the order passed by the 2nd respondent in Rc.No. 2462/2019-B5 dated 16-12- 2021 is illegal, arbitrary and against to the principles of natural justice and against to the Art. 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the operation of the order passed in .Rc.No. 2462/2019- B5 dated. 16-12-2021 pending disposal of the writ petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant leave to the Respondent No.2 in Writ Petition No.8265 of 2022 to file the counter affidavit in the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SATYANARAYANA NIMMALA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 BKM,J W.P.No.8265 of 2022 The Court made the following ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition, for which, he addressed a letter dated 01.08.2025 to the Registrar (Judicial). 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 04.08.2025 MDP