NAND LAL v. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER LUCKNOW AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/1004249/2005 · 2025-08-01
Irshad Ali
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114177 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114177 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44970 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1004249 of 2005 Petitioner :- Nand Lal Respondent :- The Additional Commissioner Lucknow And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anoop Srivastava Ii Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,R.N.Gupta Hon'ble Irshad Ali,J.
1. Sri Anoop Srivastava-II, learned counsel for the petitioner states that in spite of his best effort, instruction could not be received from the Client, therefore, he requested that the case may be dismissed for want of instruction.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of instruction. Order Date :- 1.8.2025 Gautam Digitally signed by :- GAUTAM TECKCHANDANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench