Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 114170 (ALL)

VIRENDRA NATH GUPTA v. PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY/CIVIL JUDGE SR. DIV. HARDOI and 2 ORS.

WRIA/1011/2017 · 2025-05-05

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:26000 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1011 of 2017 Petitioner :- Virendra Nath Gupta Respondent :- Prescribed Authority/Civil Judge Sr. Div. Hardoi And 2 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravi Nath Tilhari,Sanjay Srivastava,Sonu,Yogesh Kesarwani Counsel for Respondent :- Gyanendra Singh Sikarwar,Kuldeep Singh Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. Order on I.A. No.9 of 2022 1. This is an application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application. 2. The cause shown is sufficient. The application is allowed. 3. The delay in filing the substitution application is condoned. Order on I.A. No.10 of 2022 4. This is an application for setting aside abatement. 5. The application is allowed. The abatement is set aside. Order on I.A. No.11 of 2022 6. The present application has been filed for substituting the legal heirs of the sole petitioner, who died on 26.04.2021. 7. The application is allowed. 8. Let necessary incorporation be carried out during the course of the day. Order on Main Petition 9. The present petition has been filed challenging an order whereby directions were sought for against the landlord to carried out necessary repairs, whitewash etc. on the building in question. 10. Considering the relief sought; the order impugned passed and by the passage of time, no such relief can be granted at this stage. The writ petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 5.5.2025 akverma Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench