M/S GURU KRIPA ASSOCIATES AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/4524/2022 · 2025-10-07
Neeraj Tiwari, Vivek Kumar Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11416 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11416 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 4524 of 2022 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J.
HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned standing counsel for respondent no. 1 and Sri Mukesh Kumar Singh holding brief of Sri Vinay Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 & 3.
2. Present petition has been filed seeking following relief:-
"I). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No. 2 to refund the amount of Rs. 4,20,000/- deposited towards security along with the tender. II). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No. 2 to decide the representation dated 20.09.2020 of the petitioner."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that for redressal of his grievance, petitioner has filed representation dated 20.09.2020 before respondent No. 2, but till date no decision has been taken. Lastly, it is submitted that a direction may be issued to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid representation within a stipulated time, for which learned counsels for the respondents have no objection.
4. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No. 2- Chief General Manager (Transport), UP State Road Transport Corporation Ltd., HQ, Tehri Kothi, MG Marg, Lucknow to decide the representation of the petitioners dated 20.09.2020 in accordance with law maximum within period of one month from the date of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Pandey, Srestha Pandey, Vinay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. M/S Guru Kripa Associates And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
submission of certified copy of this order.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merits. It is upon respondent No. 2 to pass order after considering the relevant Rules as well as facts of the case. October 8, 2025 Arvind WRIC No. 4524 of 2022 2 (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad