Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11411 (RAJ)

PUSHPENDRA SINGH S/O SHRI BABULAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3740/2025 · 2025-03-12

Anil Kumar Upman

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:11730] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3740/2025 Pushpendra Singh S/o Shri Babulal, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village Karav, Thana Mahavan, District Mathura. (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through The PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nikhlesh Katara For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 12/03/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No.352/2019 registered at Police Station Chiksana, District Bharatpur for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 420, 406, 418, 120B & 34 of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that during the course of investigation, offences were not found proved against the petitioner therefore, negative final report was submitted by the Investigating Agency. Later on, cognizance was taken by the learned trial court and petitioner was summoned through bailable warrant. Counsel submits that there is reasonable apprehension in the mind of the petitioner that he might be sent to judicial custody on appearance. It is further submitted that petitioner is ready to face trial and judicial custody of the petitioner [2025:RJ-JP:11730] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3740/2025] would not serve any fruitful purpose. Counsel thus, prays that petitioner may be granted benefit of anticipatory bail in this matter. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by counsel for the petitioner, so also considering the fact that petitioner is ready to face the trial, this court deems it just and proper to dispose of this anticipatory bail application with a direction that petitioner shall appear before the concerned Court on or before 24.03.2025 and submit his bail bonds to the satisfaction of the said court. Concerned Court is directed to accept the bail bonds of the petitioner. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the instant criminal misc. bail application is disposed of. 7. It is made clear that this order will lose its currency in case the petitioner fails to appear before the learned trial Court on or before the given time. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /1054