Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1141 (PNJ)

GAJPAT SINGH GREWAL v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/68756/2025 · 2026-04-27

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-68756 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 206 GAJPAT SINGH GREWAL STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- Mr. D. S. Sobti Mr. Paras Jhamb, Advocate Mr. Ferry Sofat, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The 15.11.2025, Annexure P Mohali, whereby returnable by 29.11.2025 2. Learned State counsel contends that the petitioner has been granted interim bail by the Special Court, vide order dated bail bonds have been that the order dated 15.11.2025 investigating agency the petitioner 2023 (BNSS), 3. The petition, 27.04.2026 Ad 68756-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of Decision: GAJPAT SINGH GREWAL Versus PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. D. S. Sobti, Advocate with Mr. Paras Jhamb, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ferry Sofat, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed seeking , Annexure P-13, passed by learned Special whereby arrest warrants have been issued returnable by 29.11.2025. Learned State counsel contends that the petitioner has been interim bail by the Special Court, vide order dated have been accepted by the investigating officer. He further order dated 15.11.2025, as also the application moved by the investigating agency seeking initiation of proclamation proceedings under Section 84 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, have been rendered infructuous. The petition, accordingly, stands disposed of Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-68756-2025 Date of Decision: 27.04.2026 …Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA for the petitioner. Mr. Ferry Sofat, Additional Advocate General, Punjab. seeking quashing of the order dated learned Special Judge, S.A.S. Nagar, have been issued against the petitioner, Learned State counsel contends that the petitioner has been interim bail by the Special Court, vide order dated 10.04.2026, and his accepted by the investigating officer. He further submits as also the application moved by the seeking initiation of proclamation proceedings against Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, been rendered infructuous. accordingly, stands disposed of. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No the order dated Nagar, against the petitioner, Learned State counsel contends that the petitioner has been , and his submits as also the application moved by the against Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, ) Aman Dua 2026.04.30 11:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document