RIYAZ AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AND OTHERS
/81/2025 · 2025-01-09
Om Prakash Shukla, Vivek Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114068 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114068 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1529-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 81 of 2025 Petitioner :- Riyaz Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rahul Roshan Dubey,Ghanshyam Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard. Learned AGA on the basis of instructions states that there was a dispute between neighbour which was solved by the concerned policemen while he was on beat. Further none of the parties have given any complaint to the police station concerned. In case any complaint is registered, police will take action in accordance with law, maintaining law and order. The statement is taken on record. The writ petition is consigned to record. Order Date :- 9.1.2025 Reena/- (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Vivek Chaudhary,J.) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench