Crl.O.P(MD).No.360 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.01.2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR Crl.O.P(MD).No.360 of 2025 and Crl.M.P(MD) Nos.226 and 227 of 2025 1. Ravi 2. Muthuramalingam 3. Ramalingam 4. Kadambasamy 5. Subramani 6. Jayaram @ Sekar 7. Ponraj 8. Nedumaran 9. Jinnah @ Mohammed Ali Jinnad 10. Vellai @ Mari 11. Annamalai 12. Pari 13. Vairavan 14. Arivukarasu 15. Mari @ Aanamandai Mari 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD).No.360 of 2025 16. Pandiyan 17. Vanni 18. Murugan 19. Manikkam 20. Rajendran @ Alaguchellasamy 21. Arumugam 22. J.K.Alagendhiran 23. Raja 24. Illangovan 25. Balakrishnan 26. Ravi 27. Maarnadu ... Petitioners Vs The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Inspector of Police Thirupuvanam Police Station Thirupuvanam Sivagangai District. Crime No. 345/2011. ... Respondent 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD).No.360 of 2025 Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under section 528 of BNSS to call for the records pertaining to S.T.C.No. 18/2019 on the file of District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Thiruppuvanam and quash the same as against these petitioners. For Petitioners : Mr. J.Anandkumar For Respondent : Mr.A.Thiruvadi Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the case in S.T.C.No. 18 of 2019 on the file of District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruppuvanam and quash the same as against these petitioners. 2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents and perused the materials available on record. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the facts of the case are exactly similar to the case covered in the decision reported in 2018 2 LW (Crl) 606 [Jeevanandham and others vs. The Inspector of Police Velayuthampalayam Police Station, 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD).No.360 of 2025 Karur District] dated 20.09.2018 and in the case of Sri Raja vs Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station Virudhunagar District and other in batch of cases in Crl.O.P(MD) No.7922 of 2019 dated 30.08.2019. 3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police would submit that the facts of the case are similar to the facts covered under the Judgment referred above. 4.The facts of this case is similar to the facts covered by the Judgment of this Court reported in 2018 2 LW (Crl) 606 [Jeevanandham and others vs. The Inspector of Police Velayuthampalayam Police Station, Karur District] dated 20.09.2018 and in case of Sri Raja vs Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station Virudhunagar District and other in batch of cases in Crl.O.P(MD) No.7922 of 2019 dated 30.08.2019. 5.Accordingly, the proceedings in S.T.C.No. 18/2019 on the file of District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Thiruppuvanam is hereby quashed insofar as the petitioners are concerned and the Criminal 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD).No.360 of 2025 Original Petition is allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 20.01.2025 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking / Non Speaking order PNM To 1.The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Thiruppuvanam 2.The Inspector of Police Thirupuvanam Police Station Thirupuvanam Sivagangai District. Crime No. 345/2011. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD).No.360 of 2025 M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J. PNM ORDER IN Crl.O.P(MD) No. 360 of 2025 and Crl.M.P(MD) Nos.226 and 227 of 2025 20.01.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis